已核实的引文

安装指南

1. ClawHub CLI 从源直接安装技能的最快方式。
   npx clawhub@latest install pho-citation-check
2. 手动安装 将技能文件夹复制到以下位置之一
   全局模式
   ~/.openclaw/skills/
   工作区
   /skills/
   优先级：工作区 > 本地 > 内置
3. 提示词安装 将此提示词复制到 OpenClaw 即可自动安装。
   请帮我使用 Clawhub 安装 pho-citation-check。如果尚未安装 Clawhub，请先安装（npm i -g clawhub）。
   更倾向于下载？
   获取包含原生技能文件的ZIP压缩包。
   下载技能 (.zip)

什么是

已核实的引文是 Openclaw Skills 中的一套研究工作流程，用于撰写、编辑和审阅引用学术来源的文本。它使用 Phở Research Tools MCP 服务器查找论文，并对照公开研究数据库核实参考文献，帮助防止引文伪造，并发现元数据错误或撤稿情况。
此技能要求在当前对话中核实每一条参考文献后，才能向用户展示。它可以按常见引文格式或文献管理器格式整理已核实的记录，说明更正内容和未经核实的条目，并支持系统综述的 PRISMA 2020 流程图。

应用场景

使用可搜索的学术记录而非模型记忆，为某项主张或主题查找证据。
撰写包含参考文献的文献综述、手稿、资助申请文本、文章和回答。
审核手稿、论文或参考文献目录，检查错误、伪造、含糊不清或已撤稿的引文。
将已核实的参考文献转换为 APA、MLA、Chicago、Harvard、Vancouver、IEEE 或 AMA 格式。
将已核实的参考文献目录导出为 BibTeX、RIS 或 CSL-JSON。
专门检查 DOI 列表中是否存在撤稿论文。
创建 PRISMA 2020 流程图，并指出记录数量中的不一致之处。

工作原理

使用 search_papers 搜索相关论文，输入英文关键词，并可选用研究类型、年份范围或开放获取情况等筛选条件。
阅读每篇论文的摘要，确认其是否支持预期的主张；引用预印本时，应指出其尚未经过同行评审。
在展示任何参考文献之前，将完整的参考文献列表提交给 verify_references。该工具会返回诸如 verified、verified_with_corrections、retracted、likely_fabricated、not_found、ambiguous 或 not_checked 等状态。
根据状态处理每项结果：使用已核实的记录，披露并应用更正，除非是在讨论撤稿本身，否则移除伪造或已撤稿的条目，并清楚标记尚未解决的参考文献。
完成核实后，使用 format_citations 选择引文格式或导出格式。使用返回的文内引文，确保其与参考文献目录一致。
在回答中报告核实结果，包括更正、移除的条目以及任何未核实的内容。
对于系统综述，可选用记录数量调用 prisma_flow_diagram，并展示其警告，而不是悄悄更改数量。

配置指南

连接 Phở Research Tools MCP 服务器，以便此技能访问 search_papers、verify_references、format_citations、check_retractions 和 prisma_flow_diagram。
https://mcp.pho.chat/mcp
无需账户。如果 MCP 服务器不可用，请勿将记忆中的来源作为已核实的来源引用。请告知用户当前会话无法进行核实，将参考文献标记为未经核实，并引导用户使用免费检查工具：
https://pho.chat/tools/citation-checker/

数据架构

此技能支持以任意格式提供的文本学术参考文献、BibTeX、RIS，或每行一个 DOI。每次核实请求最多可包含 50 条参考文献。
数据或结果 详情
搜索筛选条件 英文关键词查询、研究类型、year_from、year_to 和 open_access_only
来源标识符 搜索结果包含可解析的 DOI 或 PubMed ID；预印本标记为 preprint: true
核实状态 verified、verified_with_corrections、retracted、likely_fabricated、not_found、ambiguous 和 not_checked
不匹配详情 mismatches 标明字段、引文中的值以及数据库查到的值
引文格式 APA、MLA、Chicago、Harvard、Vancouver、IEEE 和 AMA
导出格式 BibTeX、RIS 和 CSL-JSON
PRISMA 输出 根据提供的记录数量生成流程图，并对数字总和不符的方框发出警告
格式化后的参考文献来自数据库记录，其中可能包含更正后的元数据。技能说明未指定本地文件或持久化数据存储。

高级特性

一次调用即可核实整个参考文献列表，最多 50 条，包括用户粘贴或智能体此前回忆出的参考文献。
检测并区分更正、撤稿、疑似伪造、匹配含糊不清以及无法核实的参考文献。
支持按研究设计、发表年份和开放获取情况筛选论文搜索结果。
明确显示预印本状态，便于用户区分未经同行评审的作品。
如果参考文献已在当前对话中核实，则使用
verify: false
，避免重复查询。
如果任务仅限于撤稿筛查，可使用更快速的
check_retractions

工作原理

生成 PRISMA 2020 流程图，并报告数量警告，不会悄悄修改用户提供的数字。
MCP 工具不可用时提供安全的备用处理方式：披露限制，并将参考文献标记为未经核实。

name: verified-citations description: Use whenever you write, edit or review anything that cites papers (literature reviews, manuscripts, grant text, essays, answers with references). Finds real sources with the Phở Research Tools MCP server, verifies every reference against Crossref, PubMed and OpenAlex before showing it, formats the bibliography from the database record, and flags anything that is fabricated, wrong or retracted. license: MIT

Verified citations

Language models invent references that look perfect: real author names, real journals, a plausible DOI, and no paper behind them. They also misremember years, pages and author order on papers that do exist. This skill makes every reference you show the user one that a public database has confirmed.

It relies on the Phở Research Tools MCP server. Its tools are search_papers, verify_references, format_citations, check_retractions and prisma_flow_diagram. If those tools are not available, see "Without the tools" at the end.

The rule

Never show the user a reference that has not been through verify_references in this conversation. That includes references you remember, references the user pasted, and references from a search result you then edited.

Workflow

1. Find sources with search_papers, not from memory

When you need evidence for a claim or a topic, search instead of recalling:

Query in English keywords, for example nirsevimab RSV infants hospitalisation.
Narrow with study_types (rct, systematic-review, meta-analysis, guideline, cohort, …), year_from / year_to, and open_access_only when the user needs full text.
Every result has a DOI or PubMed ID that resolves. Retracted papers are left out.
Results marked preprint: true are not peer reviewed. Say so whenever you cite one.

Read the abstract before citing a paper for a specific claim. A title that sounds right is not evidence that the paper supports the sentence.

2. Verify with verify_references before showing anything

Pass the whole reference list in one call (up to 50 references), in any style, BibTeX, RIS, or DOIs one per line. Each reference comes back with exactly one status:

Status What to do

verified Use it.
verified_with_corrections The paper is real but a detail is wrong. Use the corrected record and tell the user which field changed.
retracted Remove it. Only cite it if the text is about the retraction, and then say it is retracted.
likely_fabricated The DOI is not registered or no such paper exists. Remove it and tell the user. Never "fix" it by guessing another paper.
not_found Could not be confirmed either way (common for books, theses, reports, very new papers). Keep it only if the user can confirm it, and mark it unverified.
ambiguous Several papers fit. Add a DOI or more detail and verify again, or ask the user.
not_checked The allowance ran out before this one. Say so; do not present it as checked. 3. Format with format_citations

Format only after verifying. Pass style (apa, mla, chicago, harvard, vancouver, ieee, ama), or set output to bibtex, ris or csl-json for a reference manager. Verified references are formatted from the database record, so the bibliography carries the corrected details. If you already verified the list in this conversation, pass verify: false to skip the second lookup.

Use the in-text citations the tool returns so the citations and the bibliography match.

4. Report what was not verified

End every answer that contains references with one short line on their state, for example:

References: 7 verified, 1 corrected (year), 1 removed as fabricated.

If anything was removed or is unverified, name it. The user should never discover a bad reference after submitting.

Reviewing someone else's text

When the user asks you to check a manuscript, thesis or reference list:

Run verify_references on the full list.
Report problems first, grouped by status, each with the cited text and what the database says (mismatches lists field, cited value and found value).
Offer the corrected list through format_citations in their style, or as BibTeX / RIS.

For a list of DOIs where only retractions matter, check_retractions is faster.

Systematic reviews

For a PRISMA 2020 flow diagram, call prisma_flow_diagram with the record counts. It returns the diagram and a warning for every box whose numbers do not add up. Show those warnings; never adjust the user's counts silently.

Without the tools

If the Phở Research Tools server is not connected, do not fall back to references from memory. Tell the user that references cannot be verified in this session, and point them to:

Connect the server: https://mcp.pho.chat/mcp (no account needed), or
Paste the list into the free checker at https://pho.chat/tools/citation-checker/

Then mark every reference you write as unverified.

智能体使用情况分析报告生成器
江湖说视角